Talk:Wavefront Technologies

A fact from Wavefront Technologies appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 September 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Wavefront Technologies developed some of the very first off-the-shelf computer animation software, for which it received Academy Awards?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/September.

Wikipedia

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Software: Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Citations?[edit]

There aren't any. This sounds like an ad. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 140.142.159.3 (talk • contribs) .

None? There are 6 references. If you're referring to lack of specific line-by-line citing of the references, I follow the model of other encyclopedias (American Nat'l Biography, New Grove, etc) of simply listing a bibliography of sources, rather than overloading an article with footnote links after each sentence (I make an exception for quotations, though). --Davepape 18:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider choosing Wikipedia's preferred referencing format. We prefer footnotes, so then it's much easier for readers to decide which book/article/whatever is most relevant for further reading. As it is, any fact could be in any article, essentially. -- Zanimum 19:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The tone towards the end (merges and acquisitions) loses its objectivity, could stand to be edited back to the facts rather than opinion. I updated a few points, but could do with a more experienced hand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.2.197.244 (talk) 14:45, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]