Talk:Wavelength
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| WikiProject Physics | (Rated B-class, High-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Archives |
|---|
[edit] Question
What is the wavelength of this wave?
What is the exact definion of wavelength? By Fourier Analysis? ––虞海 (Yú Hǎi) 17:37, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Is that a meaningful question? What do the authorities define as "wavelength" ? --Wtshymanski (talk) 17:56, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
-
- Please, per wp:talk page guidelines, take this to the wp:reference desk/science? Thanks. DVdm (talk) 18:09, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
-
-
- It doesn't sound like a ref desk question to me, but rather a rhetorical question to see whether we have included a correct and working definition. I don't know of a definition based on Fourier analysis, but there are many alternatives, and maybe one of those, too. Some definitions are predicated on the wave being periodic; others on it being sinusoidal. The "distance between peaks or troughs" definition is usually adequate, and would give a sensible answer for the wave in question, but it may not be both precise and general enough to cover all things that people call wavelength. Dicklyon (talk) 19:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- For slowly-varying and coherent wave trains a good definition is the one by Whitham (see e.g. his book Linear and nonlinear waves) through the definition of the wavenumber as the gradient of the carrier-wave phase θ(x,t): k=∇θ, so λ=2π/|k|. The wave phase of the carrier wave is obtainable through the Hilbert transform of the band-pass filtered signal (removing nonlinear sub- and super-harmonics). -- Crowsnest (talk) 22:05, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
-
-
- It's not even clear that this is a meaningful question. Not all waveforms have "a wavelength". General waveforms are composed of a spectrum of waves at different frequencies. One can only define an overall wavelength for a waveform in special cases.