Talk:We on Fire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Songs (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
 
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 03:55, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

We on FireWe On Fire – It says the new title everywhere in the page except for the title, so it must be the official name of the song. Ian Streeter (talk) 13:46, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

  • Support Oppose Amazon gives the name in the proposed form, but WorldCat says "We on Fire". Kauffner (talk) 12:11, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
    • Comment But WorldCat spells everything wrong. They didn't even spell 'Big Tymers' correctly! Ian Streeter (talk) 12:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose per WP:ALBUMCAPS (and, yes, I know this is not an album, but that guideline covers singles as well). Wikipedia has a house style and I see no reason why we shouldn't follow it here. Jenks24 (talk) 09:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
  • But just look at the single cover! It writes it as "We On Fire"! Ian Streeter (talk) 12:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose per WP:ALBUMCAPS - I don't necessarily agree with with that guideline, but we have to stick to something consistent -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:12, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
I don't have anything against styling song titles, but this seems more like careless copy editing. Kauffner (talk) 09:23, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.