Talk:White-collar crime

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Sociology (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Law (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This is my first post to wikipedia, so I apologize if I screw this up. Can someone clarify the statement from the article that "virtually no" resources are spent policing white collar crime? Various federal law enforcement agencies spend enormous resources on investigating white collar cases. Neil the man 18:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

This is a contentious issue, but I think that in comparison to what we may call (for want of a better term) 'ordinary crime', the resources spent are minimal. Also, while white collar crime is often investigated, it's rarely prosecuted, and it's rarer still that a white collar criminal does time. When he does, it's likely to be in some holiday camp and he's out in a few months. Witness Ernest Saunders, the only man in history to recover naturally from senile dementia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 11:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

White-collar juvie[edit]

I'm writing out of curiosity as someone planning on a possible future as an author... Is it possible for there to be someone sentenced to juvinille hall on white-collar charges? --DanMat6288 (talk) 15:54, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


I'm adding a link to plantation because they're the same as current & past slave plantations & corporations, just the name changed & misguided the majority of people, especially USA & UK, the world's financial leading nations who rule the world. It's easier to see with multinational corporations, like Firestone Liberia controversy, which is why exploitation exists in all nations & that includes America; they can't ever "create enough jobs" & now they want to eliminate all jobs with automation to "increase profits": proof the wage is wrong & causes crime. Stars4change (talk) 04:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. That's really going to help this article.

Merge proposal[edit]

It seems that Organi-cultural deviance and white collar crime cover the same ground. While the former article makes the case that the two are separate, this article makes it clear that Sutherland did indeed view corporate/white-collar crime as reflecting systemic socialization of deviance. Having two articles on the same topic is a form of content forkery. Moreover, it's not clear that the organi-cultural deviance model is notable enough one, having only two hits at google scholar and none at JSTOR. — Ƶ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 17:05, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Oppose - while the two articles mention similar topics, the article on organi-cultural deviance is a philosophical model and a topic of philosophy and the history of philosophical thought on corporate crime. They are not forks since the two address separate topics. - M0rphzone (talk) 00:06, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Two very closely related topics. And the issue of notability? — Ƶ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 01:04, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Based on search results, this term seems uncommon, but search results are not definitive, and this maybe be an issue of obscurity rather than notability. - M0rphzone (talk) 01:48, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
What's the difference? — Ƶ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 02:11, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Organi-cultural deviance is a philosophical topic that's obscure and unknown by most people, but that doesn't mean it's not notable. - M0rphzone (talk) 02:44, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
I see, but just because its obscurity doesn't mean it's not notable doesn't mean it's notable. It seems that this theoretical model is too new and obscure within any field. — Ƶ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 03:06, 11 November 2012 (UTC)


Support - there seems to be no good reason to maintain this clear content WP:FORK. It's fine there are two names for the same thing - it often happens: we simply redirect the obscure one to the common one, and if there's anything worth merging we merge. There might be a small footnote mentioning that "organi-cultural deviance" is a recent philosophical category on the subject. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:07, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Support - I dont see evidence of impact yet. Very low citation count on the PhD paper Systematic differentiation between Dark and Light Leaders[1]; "organi-cultural deviance" has zero hits in Scopus, and the two hits in Google Scholar are both without citations[2] and the AABSS paper hasnt received many web hits yet[3] John Vandenberg (chat) 22:40, 3 March 2013 (UTC)