Talk:Who Cares a Lot?

European edition

Despite what the article states, I live in Europe and got the 2 CD version in a local shop. --Pushit 14:44, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

It may have been imported. I live in Chile and bought the German edition of Angel Dust in a local shop. -Alvareo (talk) 19:08, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

I have the same cd, bought it when came out in the Netherlands. It is not an import (otherwise it would have been much more expensive) and it says it is a limited edition 2cd (with sticker). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.85.3.213 (talk) 12:22, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

I own many copies of this and made an edit last year which corrected the whole page but was reverted incorrectly. I have been advised in the IRC chanel to advise that I will be seeking to reinstate my last edit (with better grammar) shortly which will re-incorporate all the missing information which was lost when my edit was reverted and remove the completely invented information. With this will be the notion that Who Cares A Lot got a UK release. At that time in 1998 Polygram owned London Records under the guidance of Roger Ames. Polygram signed a Europe wide agreement with STEMRA from 1987 until 1996 when MCPS signed a new agreement with Polygram. Stemra is a dutch rights society meaning some collectors mistakenly think it means it was released in Netherlands. MCPS are a British organisation which meant that people think it significes an English release. This is not the case. As users above have testified, the 2 CD limited edition was indeed available in the UK but also in Europe, this is because by and large Polygram saw Europe (inclusive of Britain) as a single economic market and besides special projects and singles, albums were nearly always for the whole market and not just parts of them. There are exceptions but they are not part of this discussion. Further info on rights societies and markets: http://pastebin.com/ehypWYVm AD828321 (talk) 12:22, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Whocalcover.jpg

Image:Whocalcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:40, 15 January 2008 (UTC)