Talk:William H. Prescott

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article William H. Prescott has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Biography / Science and Academia (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
 
WikiProject Mesoamerica (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pre-Columbian Mesoamerica, its civilizations, history, accomplishments and other related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Peru (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Genealogy[edit]

I question the value in the recent addition of distant genealogical ties. "Fourth cousin, six times removed" etc is really streching it. I'd propose most if not all of the tree has little significance to the article itself, and reads like a hobbyist data-mining for 'famous' connections. Is it really needed?--cjllw ʘ TALK 02:52, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Take it out. Others would call it vandalism. It's a waste of space. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.111.109.106 (talk) 01:25, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
It's removed now. --cjllw ʘ TALK 23:57, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Mexico book[edit]

Should mention how he gained wide scholarly respect with his Mexico book, even though he had never actually been in Mexico... AnonMoos (talk) 02:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Revamp - May 2010[edit]

I will be making fairly major edits to the article over the next few weeks, and hope to get it to a much better quality. Anyone who's interested in this subject is welcome to assist, whether by expanding current information, adding more sources or just checking my work for errors. Thanks. Claritas (talk) 17:37, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Peck's work.[edit]

If anyone can find a free ebook of [1], I will be very much indebted to them. Thanks. Claritas § 11:40, 29 May 2010 (UTC)