Talk:Wind power in South Australia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wind power in South Australia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 60 days

Wind power in South Australia was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 9, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
January 16, 2023	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

Australia: South Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Wind power in South Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comparison with similar good article[edit]

This is the only "Wind power in ....." good article I can find so I read it looking for ideas for Wind power in Turkey which is being reviewed by Vice regent. I would welcome your expert comments at Talk:Wind power in Turkey/GA1 Chidgk1 (talk) 11:23, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How does it fit in to Energy in South Australia?[edit]

42% of electricity gen is mentioned but not the % of Energy in South Australia - suggest you add. Does SA have a plan to replace oil usage with electricity and if so will electric cars balance variable renewables? How does wind power supply fit with electricity demand e.g. seasonal variation? Chidgk1 (talk) 11:33, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment[edit]

Delisted. Chidgk1 (talk) 14:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Wind power in South Australia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

More than one section was tagged months ago as needing update. If someone is willing to update please let me know and I will then check for and list anything else needed to keep it good.Chidgk1 (talk) 08:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend delisting. It has been eight days since the review started with no improvement. Parts of the article are really repetitive, for example:

Construction of Stage 1 began in September 2015 and was finished in September 2017. Stage 1 consists of 32 turbines each having a rated capacity of 3.2 MW (total 102.4 MW). Construction of Stage 2 began in July 2016 and was finished in June 2017. Stage 2 consists of 32 turbines each having a rated capacity of 3.2 MW (total 102.4 MW). Construction of Stage 3 began in April 2017 and was finished in December 2017. Stage 3 consists of 35 turbines each having a rated capacity of 3.2 MW (total 112 MW).

The article also has a questionable overlap with List of wind farms in South Australia and the Operational wind farms section feels more like a list than an article. The short sections do not make for good readability. Finally, when I see the 2011 Renewable Energy Plan section, I wonder if there have been any other or more recent plans relating to wind energy. Steelkamp (talk) 16:47, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delisting as no longer meets GA criteria 3a to be broad in its coverage and address the main aspects of the topic Chidgk1 (talk) 13:44, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.