Talk:Women of Faith

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject United States / Texas (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (marked as Low-importance).
 
WikiProject Christianity (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 


Untitled[edit]

As I stated in the about section, Women of Faith has had more than 3 million women have shared the conference experience since it began in the mid-1990s. I don't think it's a sermon, I just put information that they have on their website. Gobazkov

Neutrality?[edit]

This article doesn't seem really neutral. Also, it has a lot of extraneous information (the themes of the various conferences?). I think it should be significantly trimmed down. Fishhook (talk) 14:17, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. Large chunks have clearly been copied directly from the organisation's web site (the copyright symbol is a clear indicator of that). I'll make a first pass at making it more suitable. Gusworld (talk) 00:10, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

First-pass edit[edit]

I've removed the duplicate, copy-and-pasted and non-neutral material. Article really needs a lot more neutral sources and more context for the events, but this at least has eliminated the blatant corporate info/PR stuff. Gusworld (talk) 00:33, 19 May 2012 (UTC)