Talk:World of Warcraft

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article World of Warcraft was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Video games (Rated B-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Blizzard task force.
 
Note icon
A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)
WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
WikiProject icon A version of this article was copy edited by Spock of Vulcan, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 25 January 2011. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English and Wikipedia's policies and guidelines to help in the drive to improve articles. Visit our project page if you're interested in joining! If you have questions, please direct them to our talk page.
 
e·h·w·Stock post message.svg To-do:

Goals

  1. Achieve GA status
  2. To edit as necessary in order to improve the article,

See the Warcraft task force talk page on preceding in this venture.

Source discussion[edit]

My addition to the "Development" section was reverted because the source I used was not a "reliable source." I disagree and ask other editors to weigh in. The Game Informer website is specifically listed as a reliable source at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources (under the "Reliable source" section). I understand there may be a concern that the author is not an "editor" at Game Informer, but Game Informer, as a reliable source, will provide oversight of material on its website. Also, WP:RS states that, besides the publisher of the work (which is reliable in this case), the author and work itself should be considered. The work itself appears to be of fairly high quality. The author does not appear to be a professional in the video game industry, but has written over 1000 posts on Game Informer. I'll defer to a consensus of the editors here on whether the source can be used to support the inclusion of the passage in the article, but a sweeping "it's not reliable" is too abrupt and a closer look is merited, in my opinion. Thanks! Airborne84 (talk) 16:05, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 September 2014[edit]

this article needs to add Leroy Jenkins, for he has become part of the game by pure chance and should be recognized as such. 209.7.119.165 (talk) 18:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. -- ferret (talk) 19:40, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Mists of Pandaria part of the base game now[edit]

Could someone please update the "Expansions" section? It doesn't mention the fact that MoP is now free just like the other older expansions. Official article for reference: http://eu.battle.net/wow/en/blog/16368211 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scr00chy (talkcontribs) 02:58, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

As of October 14, 2014. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sawoodley (talkcontribs) 06:36, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Warlords of Draenor has been launched[edit]

The expansion pack launched on November 13th.

The fifth expansion set, Warlords of Draenor, was announced at BlizzCon 2013[1] and released on November 13, 2014.[2]

Yes check.svg Done -- ferret (talk) 15:16, 15 November 2014 (UTC)