Talk:Written language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Linguistics (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Contents

[edit] Written versus spoken language

Written language is a language whose words and sentences are written in paper instead of being spoken: strange thing, makes the distinction written/spoken appear as strong as the difference between spoken languages, which doesn't look right. So IMO this article should be reworked (and renamed) or deleted. --FvdP 20:50 14 Jul 2003 (UTC)

I think I fixed your concern. I made a (too?) strong statement about the absence of purely written languages. If anyone has any credible source to discount please let me know.

--Selket 05:38, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

My experience as a person with hyperlexia and Asperger Syndrome is that the difference between spoken and written languages is much wider than most people realize. My first language is written English; I learned to read by the age of 3, and although I did learn to speak before then, I picked up a lot more from books than from lectures or sermons on the same topics. For the first twenty years of my life, I transcribed speech into text in my mind so automatically that it took a neurological shift for me to realize I was doing it. I became fluent in spoken English around the age of twenty, thanks to nightly hour-long intimate conversations with two friends over the course of several months. If we ever contact alien life, I believe this article's assertion that "written language is an invention in that it must be taught to children, who will instinctively learn or create spoken or gestural languages" will only prove true in that we have no natural appendages for writing (crude jokes about yellow snow notwithstanding). --BlueNight (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

[edit] ASL

Isn't using ASL as an example of a language with a written complement a bit misleading? Is there a standard written form of ASL? If no-one objects I'll delete this from the page. thefamouseccles 07:41, 10 Mar 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Most Efficient Writing Style

Does anyone know what the most efficient/advanced writing system/language is? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.205.122.30 (talk) 21:29, 18 August 2007

If you mean pen and ink writing on paper with the fewest number of strokes, then shorthand is the most efficient. If you broaden it to mean any method of printing human speech on paper, then a computer speech recognition system that prints out what you say in a microphone is the most efficient, although the error rate is high. Greensburger 20:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Diglossia

"However, such diglossia is often considered as one between literary language and other registers, especially if the writing system reflects its pronunciation."

I'd like to help this sentence, but I don't know what it means. "One" is probably "one diglossia"; but "however" suggests a contrast with what precedes it, and I don't see any contrast; and I can't imagine what it could be saying that could be affected in any way by whether or not the writing system reflects its pronunciation. Can anyone suggest what point this sentence is trying to make? Pi zero (talk) 23:44, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export