From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former featured article candidate Wyoming is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
March 30, 2007 Featured article candidate Not promoted
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject United States / Wyoming (Rated C-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Wyoming (marked as Top-importance).
Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team / v0.7
WikiProject icon This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
Taskforce icon
This article has been selected for Version 0.7 and subsequent release versions of Wikipedia.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Population Increase between 1970 and 1980[edit]

A chart in the article shows that between 1970 and 1980, there was an increase of population by over 40 per cent. Unfortunately, there is no further explanation in the text, e.g. in the history section. Could someone please add some information regarding this increase?

And, by the way, information on the history of the last few decades in the article is rare, anyway. Someone with greater knowledge or more insights should extend the article. -- Gut informiert (talk) 15:27, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Lead, Wyoming boundaries[edit]

There doesn't seem to be an explanation about the boundaries in the body as there should be. In fact, is that correct? I am thinking it might be territory that came from the purchases not boundaries. Can someone enlighten me before I go exploring on my own? Thanks. Ward20 (talk) 07:50, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

This part of the current lead:

Wyoming also is the only state whose boundaries were acquired through four separate purchases: first during the Louisiana Purchase, second from the Annexation of Texas, third from the Oregon Country, fourth and last from the Mexican-American War.

One, yes, it should certainly read "whose territory was acquired...", not "whose boundaries..." Two, only the first of the four listed was really a "purchase". Texas was "annexed" by request, the Oregon Country was claimed and ultimately fixed via treaty, and the Mexican Cession was annexed by conquest. Three, this might be true if limited to "since the US was established in 1783", as colonial territory was established through many treaties, wars, etc. Even then, according to File:UnitedStatesExpansion.png Colorado arguably involves four acquisitions: Louisiana Purchase, Adams–Onís Treaty (the small purple bit), Texas Annexation, and Mexican Cession. Then there are additional possibilities. Part of the territory of New Mexico was arguably acquired with the Louisiana Purchase, then given up in the Adam-Onís Treaty, then acquired again in the Texas Annexation and the Mexican Cession, and further added to with the Gadsden Purchase. Is that three or four, or even five territorial changes? Finally, as often the case when talking about territorial acquisitions Native American land cessions/purchases are being ignored here. Pfly (talk) 20:25, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Well thank you kind Wikipedian. I think then the material should be removed from the lead. Then the expansion should be developed in the body and afterward re-evaluated to to see what if anything should be included in the lead.Ward20 (talk) 22:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Makes sense to me! Pfly (talk) 00:36, 2 March 2014 (UTC)


The images in the geography section are poorly organized and are causing white space issues, and some may have to move elsewhere. The map of the national parks doesn't seem fully necessary, too. I may try moving some around.Scarlettail (talk) 03:46, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

It seems better now for some reason, never mind. Scarlettail (talk) 20:37, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


The article stated:

The religious affiliations of the people of Wyoming are as follows: Christian 78%, Protestant 47%, Catholic 23%, LDS (Mormon) 9%,< ref >"Mississippi and Alabama Most Protestant States in U.S". Retrieved 2014-06-04. </ ref> Jewish <0.5%, Jehovah's Witness 2%, Muslim <0.5%, Buddhist 1%, Hindu <0.5% and Non-Religious at 20%.< ref >"U.S. Religion Map and Religious Populations". Retrieved January 10, 2014. </ ref > < ! - - To whoever keeps deleting these percentages: why are you deleting them? They're from the cited source just like the others. Please explain your reasoning on the talk page for this article - - >

I wasn't the one that removed any figures before but I now removed most of the paragraph (including these percentages) because the information seemed faulty and was badly sourced:

  1. As I understand it, the first ref might either have been intented to source the LDS percentage as 9% - however, it actually give percentages for Protestants, Catholics and Jews as well. I included these, though if one reads through the article, the method of ascertaining Protestant figures is a bit biased.
  2. The second ref is supposed to source all the figures is more problematic. It doesn't like to specific information but only to a website that forces the reader to click through several choices to get anything. As such, the link is useless to the reader.
    1. The best I could find was percentages for Montana and Wyoming combined.
    2. Without this ref, there is no basis for Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu or non-religious figures.
  3. For more than one reason, it is absurd to give a percentage of Christian as 77% next to Protestant 47% and Catholic 23%.

Str1977 (talk) 17:03, 19 December 2014 (UTC)