Talk:XBin

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

from VfD:

Non notable vanity stub. Only garners 1590 hits on google (XBIN +ANSI (1180), XBIN +ACiD (410)). Hopelessly POV. —RaD Man (talk) 07:06, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Delete - agree. Cdc 07:38, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Merge a quick mention into ACiD Productions or perhaps merge both into ANSI art. "WTF is an XBIN image?" is something I've actually had to look up before. iMeowbot~Mw 07:53, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Since XBin is apparently something that people do want to search for, I'd say Redirect to either ACiD Productions or ANSI art and merge. — Asbestos | Talk 15:53, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Delete, nn. Ok, Keep Wyss 18:51, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Keep, how can a file format be vanity? What exactly is POV about it, much less "hopelessly" so? Seems a perfectly reasonable article to me, I see no reason to delete. Wolfman 01:27, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
keep Yuckfoo 04:51, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Keep, but cleanup in a major way. --fvw * 08:05, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)
Keep. Please don't disrupt Wikipedia to make a point. [[User:GRider|GRider\^talk]] 17:39, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Keep - I agree with Wolfman. Seems like a reasonable article to me. --Fyrefiend 06:43, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion