Talk:Yisrael Mendel Kaplan

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 April 2022. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by Scope creep (talk · contribs) on 4 April 2022.

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

notability-tagged Jan 2010[edit]

Abductive recently prodded this article and Phil Bridger subsequently reverted on the justification that there is a biography of the subject cited in the article. However, it's unclear whether this is really sufficient in this case. A WorldCat search shows that this bio (published 16 years ago) is held by only 16 instituions world-wide. For comparison, the vanity-published book "Off the Wall" (which has been discussed here before) is held by more than 4 times as many. The article doesn't offer much else that clearly demonstrates notability. It probably should be brought to AfD if additional material cannot be found. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 17:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC).[reply]

I tend to agree. Since the subject is dead, there is no hurry to bring it to AfD. I'll see if editors at WP:WikiProject Judaism have any opinions. Abductive (reasoning) 17:50, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It needs to be expanded to include his important pupils. If none can be mentioned, there is little evidence of notability. JFW | T@lk 20:43, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Even if he had notable pupils, notability cannot be claimed because it cannot be WP:INHERITED. For example, Oprah's 6th grade teacher (whomever that might have been) is not notable simply for being such. I think the burden rather lies with furnishing WP:RS that show why he is notable. My point is that the above-mentioned book that has been named as such a source may only exist in the form of a handful of copies worldwide and that even vanity-published books (which are not regularly considered reliable) are more widely held. I think that observation raises some legitimate doubt about the book and, consequently, about the subject himself. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 21:35, 15 January 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Support AfD. I have seen the book but not read it; it appears to me that this entire article is based on the book. While Reb Mendel may have been a wonderful role model for his students, Chabad's Rabbi Mendel Kaplan of Florida seems to take up all the Google hits[1]. When I type in "Yisrael Mendel Kaplan", I get a series of Wikipedia mirror sites.[2] And what about that template at the bottom of the page with all the red links? I think that has to go, too. Yoninah (talk) 22:01, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged the template for notability per your observation. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 17:29, 21 January 2010 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yisrael Mendel Kaplan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080820044629/http://ssdi.genealogy.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/ssdi.cgi to http://ssdi.genealogy.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/ssdi.cgi

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]