From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Food and drink / Foodservice (Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geographic scope of guides[edit]

The article says the Zagat Survey covers 70 cities - are these the great cities of the world (Paris, London, Hong Kong, Tokyo) or is the survey restricted to the US? How does it compare to other guides, for example, the Michelin Guide, in terms of its impact, its distribution, and global coverage? Which guide is considered more prestigious to appear in? LordAmeth (talk) 01:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

about 25 US cities, the rest around the rest of world. ZAGAT list Matt Whyndham (talk) 16:13, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


About merging "Tim Zagat" with "Zagat Survey" -- I don't think this is a good idea; yes, this article is a stub, but the man (Tim Zagat) and the business (Zagat Survey) are two entirely different things. The solution is to expand the Tim Zagat article.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:54, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

However, it looks as though the Tim Zagat and Nina Zagat articles could be profitably merged into a Tim and Nina Zagat article. See Talk:Tim Zagat#Merger with Nina Zagat for a discussion. -- (talk) 19:17, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Based on the lack of either enthusiasm or opposition, I was bold and merged the two articles into Tim and Nina Zagat. --Bejnar (talk) 16:35, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Zagat Guide to American Militias 2010[edit]

I removed the mention of militias, because it's not a real book. If it has to be mentioned, maybe a trivia or pop culture references section might be added. --Erpelchen (talk) 11:44, 29 May 2011 (UTC)