Template:Did you know nominations/Alison Weir

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 12:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Alison Weir[edit]

Created/expanded by Ruby2010 (talk). Self nom at 03:44, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

  • Nice presentation. Looks like the additions to the article were done carefully and thoughtfully. I've had the article on my watch list for several years, and the difference between what it was just a few days ago to what it is now is that it's a much stronger article. Good improvement on the new details and flow of writing and the new addition of solid sources. The newly added image is public domain (copyright expired). Hook is sourced, and the length had just squeaked in over the 5x expansion amount at the time of the nomination, but the article has since been edited and that brought it down 66 characters below 5x. I don't have an issue with this, but unsure how these things are normally handled. Seems like a petty thing to not allow approval for DYK of this much-improved article, but other comments appreciated. I can leave a message with the nominator to see if maybe there's additional details that might (re)fill that gap. Dawnseeker2000 19:11, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the kind words and review. I should be able to scrounge up some more detail later today or so. Ruby 2010/2013 19:52, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
I added some more content about the subject of her next non-fiction book (Elizabeth of York), and about her support of Northampton Castle. Ruby 2010/2013 01:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
The original hook might be the better one to go with, after having some time to look at this even more closely (Did the review on my lunch hour at work, so was feeling a bit rushed). Seems like the first hook conveys just about the same information in a much quicker fashion. Just imagining it stacked along with the other hooks, and might gain more curious clickers that would otherwise get bored about half way through the longer alt hook. Dawnseeker2000 02:27, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
I have no preference either way, but agree with your argument favoring the first hook. Do you think I should wikilink fiction and non-fiction? I'm thinking of WP:OVERLINK here. Ruby 2010/2013 03:06, 1 June 2012 (UTC)