The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 01:01, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Article looks fine to me.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 17:59, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Replacing in suggestions area. Questions have been raised about the hook and referencing which need addressing. Espresso Addict (talk) 14:51, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
I raised the questions in Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Hook needs tweaking. I would suggest a hook similar to "... that the 15.4 metres (51 ft) long Anantashayana Vishnu(pictured) is the longest X in India?", where X needs to be replaced with a good description of what exactly it is the longest of. If there are aspects of the original hook that are not part of the definition of "longest in India", then these can be added at the front, e.g. " "... that the 15.4 metres (51 ft) long exposed rock cut structure Anantashayana Vishnu(pictured) is the longest X in India?" or whatever flows best and has all the necessary information. Fram (talk) 15:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
This is an expansion article. Pre-expansion size was 811 characters of readable prose. 5X would 4,055. Right now, it has 2,755 characters of readable prose. — Maile (talk) 15:16, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed: the article needs another 1300 prose characters to qualify as a 5x expansion for DYK. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:54, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Nvvchar added some new text. Now 4114B. --RedtigerxyzTalk 18:15, 15 December 2012 (UTC)