Template:Did you know nominations/Brookville Tunnel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Brookville Tunnel's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the WikiProject Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 18:46, 17 February 2013 (UTC).

Brookville Tunnel[edit]

Created by MountainRail (talk). Self nom at 00:55, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Article - moved from user space on 12 February, so new enough; 8178 characters excluding quote, so long enough; neutral; at least one inline citation to every paragraph; no copy vios detected using earwig; and not a stub.
  • Hook - within length criteria at 170 characters; correctly formatted; caught my attention; and supported by ref #10 (checked via google books).
  • QPQ done; images used in article are US PD although none used in DYK.
  • My preference would be for the duplicated 'footnotes' to be presented differently but I can't see this listed as a DYK requirement, so I don' think it affects this nomination getting approval?
Symbol confirmed.svg Interesting article! SagaciousPhil - Chat 13:57, 17 February 2013 (UTC)