The following is an archived discussion of Cardboard bicycle's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination's(talk) page, the nominated article's(talk) page, or the DYK WikiProject's(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this pageSee the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Article is new enough, and the length and sourcing of both the article and the hook meet DYK requirements. There are almost more sources than sentences in the article. My only suggestion is that the low-cost aspect could also be highlighted, and may I suggest ALT1 "... that a cardboard bicycle has been made that weighs just 20 pounds (9.1 kg), can support up to 220 kilograms (490 lb) and be mass produced at a retail cost of 20 USD?" or some variation thereof to make it even hookier. Alansohn (talk) 16:56, 1 February 2013 (UTC)