Template:Did you know nominations/Deputy Prime Minister of Pakistan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:10, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Deputy Prime Minister of Pakistan[edit]

  • Reviewed: Reviews
  • Comment: Article expended.

Created/expanded by Sahara4u (talk), Wanishah] (talk), Burhan Ahmed (talk). Nominated by Sahara4u (talk) at 01:43, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

It's a BLP. The nominator/author doesn't seem to have contributed which confuses me. I'm presuming this is being treated as an unreferenced BLP so it would need two fold expansion. However it's still only got one reference and most paragraphs don't have any citations. Secretlondon (talk) 08:01, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Maybe you clicked the wrong link. I pull up an article about a government position "The Deputy Prime Minister of Pakistan", not an individual. It has six online references that were there since June 26. The nominator is the main contributor. Maile66 (talk) 19:30, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Ah sorry - I did click on the wrong link. Secretlondon (talk) 06:44, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
  • DYK Detector comes up with numerous duplicates of partial phrases from all the references, with the exception of The News International reference. Maybe you could work on the prose, and we can look at this again.
  • I think credit should also go to the other two editors who were working on this article on June 25 Wanishah (talk · contribs) and June 26 Burhan Ahmed (talk · contribs)
Maile66 (talk) 14:44, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I'm working on the article, and of course, they should be! ZiaKhan 15:08, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Did some work on the article, you may have a look again. ZiaKhan 07:17, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Perhaps you could run Duplication detector on all your referencing. I just ran it against just the first three references, and duplication concerns come up. Specifically, a lot of your lead section looks to be duplicated from the sources. A little more work to be done, please. Maile66 (talk) 17:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Made some changes in the lead. ZiaKhan 06:03, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Please run the Duplication Detector on References 1 and 2, and find where it is in your article these phrases seem to be duplicated. Maile66 (talk) 11:09, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Did some more work. ZiaKhan 06:39, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Good to go. The following has been checked in this review:
  • Multiple QPQ done by Sahara4u in June 2012
  • Created on June 25, 2012, and has readable prose of 2,324 characters
  • Hook is short enough at 75 characters, and referenced at end of sentence
  • NPOV article about current events in Pakistan
  • Duplication Detector run, no copyvio found
  • Every paragraph sourced
Maile66 (talk) 12:30, 12 July 2012 (UTC)