The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 05:16, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Article has been expanded well in excess of 5 times, is well written with numerous incline citations. Picture is okay too. Hook is interesting, though I'd question whether any of the sources cited in the article say the carvings are "fine". They seem to describe the carvings very objectively. Maybe just need to remove that word "fine"? Sionk (talk) 00:27, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. I have deleted the word 'fine' at two places in the article and also in the hook--Nvvchar. 02:57, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
In that case I've got no further objections. Good to go. Sionk (talk) 11:59, 17 November 2013 (UTC)