Template:Did you know nominations/Fishing Creek confederacy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination  The following is an archived discussion of Fishing Creek confederacy's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination's (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the DYK WikiProject's (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:18, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Fishing Creek confederacy[edit]

  • Comment: I know this is slightly unorthodox, as I wrote the article, but to me it has a distinctly "hookish" feel to it.

Created/expanded by King jakob c (talk). Self nom at 22:56, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Hook, references, size, neutrality, all look good. but the article isn't 5 days old. Ryan shell (talk) 15:12, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Sandbox → mainspace moves in lieu of article creation are permitted (Eligibility criteria, 1d., the date of transfer was the 29th in my time-zone). You might want to add a picture of the Fishing Creek to the article for reference. That image is, by the way, not copyrighted. --Marianian(talk) 23:32, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
  • I added the picture of Fishing Creek, but I may be able to get a more relevant picture tomorrow.King Jakob C 00:09, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Actually, I can't get the picture yet. Anyway, is this article good enough to become a DYK? King jakob c 2 (talk) 22:54, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Pictures are always good for a Wikipedia article and it looks relevant enough. Agree that hook, references, size, neutrality are met, plus Criteria 1d met. Good luck! --Marianian(talk) 13:51, 3 February 2013 (UTC)