Template:Did you know nominations/Grace Gates
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 02:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Grace Gates[edit]
.jpg)
- ... that the Lord's Grace Gates (pictured) were being damaged by turning lorries?
- Reviewed: Lufsig
Created by The C of E (talk). Self nominated at 08:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC).
Length is OK even after the quote is excluded. Well referenced, including the hook. Some facts in the lede are not repeated in the main body (info only). No obvious paraphrasing. I think the hook is unusual as it doesn't mention why this fact is important. Can I suggest
- (alt1)... that the Lord's Grace Gates (pictured) were nearly moved as they were being damaged by turning lorries?
- Victuallers 22:07, 2 January 2014 signed for Victuallers by Harrias talk 20:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what "agree with revision" means here, since Bill is not the nominator. It would be better if C of E weighed in on the ALT hook, and it needs to be checked for sourcing and verification of statement in the article. — Maile (talk) 18:48, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- I think he means that he agrees with the revised hook and the original review. If you want my view on the alt, I have absolutely no problem with it since it is essentially the same hook only with "nearly moved" in it. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 20:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Both are ready to go Victuallers (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2014 (UTC)