Template:Did you know nominations/Grolier Codex
The following is an archived discussion of Grolier Codex's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 00:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC).
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Grolier Codex[edit]
- ... that the authenticity of the supposedly Maya Grolier Codex is disputed, even though it uses pre-Columbian paper?
- Reviewed: Abouriou
Created by Simon Burchell (talk). Self nominated at 22:58, 20 April 2013 (UTC).
- New article from redirect. Simon Burchell (talk) 23:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Article newness, length, and general compliance with policy have been confirmed. Suggested fact is interesting and supported by an inline citation. On a non-DYK basis, I have only one piece of advice: the lead is half referenced and half not. Either style is acceptable, but I would prefer consistency (which would mean incorporating the first paragraph material into the body in full). Overall, very well written and interesting article that I enjoyed reading. Good work. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
