The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3talk 00:24, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Comment: Hook quote is supported in text, and comes from page 105 of the book, verifiable online HERE. The two short quotes come from two consecutive paragraphs on p. 105.
Created/expanded by Presearch (talk). Self nom at 17:28, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Article is long enough and new (transferred from userspace on 10 October) well-written, and generally well-sourced. Hook verified online. I've added one citation needed tag, but it should be good to go after that's addressed. Sasata (talk) 09:33, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. I've added a new citation that I hope will address the concern you identified. All newly cited info is available online. I look forward to your response (and possible "good to go" symbol, if all is now well). Many thanks in advance -- Presearch (talk) 21:19, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Good to go! Sasata (talk) 17:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC)