The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
(because of the QPQ) Otherwise, this is fine. The article is a bit fluffy and I trimmed some verbosity. That quote is cutesie, but that's not necessarily a good thing. Also, I quietly removed a redundant word from the hook; if that requires another reviewer we have gone too far. Drmies (talk) 01:05, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Over three weeks since nominator was notified of need for a QPQ review. While the nominator has been active on the English Wikipedia, there is no evidence of any progress to meeting this one final requirement before the article can be promoted. --Allen3talk 19:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)