Template:GAList2

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality: [[File:|16px|alt=|link=]]

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: [[File:|16px|alt=|link=]]

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources: [[File:|16px|alt=|link=]]

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: [[File:|16px|alt=|link=]]

   C. No original research: [[File:|16px|alt=|link=]]

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects: [[File:|16px|alt=|link=]]

   B. Focused: [[File:|16px|alt=|link=]]

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias: [[File:|16px|alt=|link=]]

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc: [[File:|16px|alt=|link=]]

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: [[File:|16px|alt=|link=]]

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: [[File:|16px|alt=|link=]]

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: [[File:|16px|alt=|link=]]

Template documentation

Usage

{{subst:GAList2
|overcom=
|1a=
|1acom=
|1b=
|1bcom=
|2a=
|2acom=
|2b=
|2bcom=
|2c=
|2ccom=
|3a=
|3acom=
|3b=
|3bcom=
|4=
|4com=
|5=
|5com=
|6a=
|6acom=
|6b=
|6bcom=
|7=
|7com=
}}

Available arguments are y, n, aye, nay, wtf, and ???; some synonyms are also available for these arguments. Any other argument or no argument at all gives an undecided mark.

The comment lines ("com") are used for additional notes. If no comment is included, the comment line doesn't appear. This is also true of "overcom", which allows for general comments before the subsections.

Note that the template should be substituted, as the GA guidelines are reviewed from time to time and this template may be changed.

Example

{{GAList2
|overcom=This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
|1a=y
|1acom=Well done.
|1b=y
|2a=n
|2b=y
|2c=???
|2ccom=Some of the information in the third section appears to be OR.
|3a=y
|3b=y
|4=y
|5=
|6a=n
|6b=y
|7=n
|7com=Good luck with improving this article!
}}

results in:

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

{{subst:#if:This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.|

---

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.|}}

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   {{subst:#if:Well done.|Well done.|}}

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   {{subst:#if:|{{{1bcom}}}|}}

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   {{subst:#if:|{{{2acom}}}|}}

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   {{subst:#if:|{{{2bcom}}}|}}

   C. No original research:

   {{subst:#if:Some of the information in the third section appears to be OR.|Some of the information in the third section appears to be OR.|}}

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   {{subst:#if:|{{{3acom}}}|}}

   B. Focused:

   {{subst:#if:|{{{3bcom}}}|}}

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   {{subst:#if:|{{{4com}}}|}}

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   {{subst:#if:|{{{5com}}}|}}

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   {{subst:#if:|{{{6acom}}}|}}

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   {{subst:#if:|{{{6bcom}}}|}}

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   {{subst:#if:Good luck with improving this article!|Good luck with improving this article!|}}

Note: This template is a modification of {{GAList}}. Thanks to AzaToth and others for making the original.

See also

• {{GAList/check}}