Template talk:Anarcho-capitalism

Group structuring

Sardanaphalus (talk · contribs) added the group name "Overview" for the first list, to complement "Features" for the second. I removed the name, arguing that it did not accurately describe the first list and was superfluous. Sardanaphalus then posted the following to my talkpage:

"Fair enough; as you probably guessed, I did simply invent the description in order to provide a groupname to complement "Features". Perhaps, then, "Features" may as well be removed too -- it otherwise seems to draw too much attention..? Sardanaphalus (talk) 02:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)"

The issue here for me is that the first list is a list of the main (i.e. most relevant and important) articles we have on anarcho-capitalism, whereas the second list contains articles on aspects or features of an anarcho-capitalist society (in other words, anarcho-capitalist theory). Taking a cue from music band templates where the members are listed without description as members (i.e. {{Rage Against the Machine}}), followed by other articles related to the band in named groups (i.e. Albums, Tours, Videos), I thought leaving the main articles undescribed while describing the "aspects of anarcho-capitalist society" as Features (of "Anarcho-capitalism", by implication). Is this appropriate, should there be two named groups, or none? the skomorokh 13:06, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

• Apart from doing nothing (if that's the consensus) I imagine there's a few possibilities, e.g. rather than sitting on the lefthand side, the "Features" label might sit above the list that follows. I guess, though, the discussion first is whether or not to include "Features" and/or a label for the first list. Sardanaphalus (talk) 14:17, 23 September 2008 (UTC)