Template talk:Apple Inc. hardware

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Apple Inc. (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Macintosh, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Computing / Hardware (Rated Template-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This template has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by Computer hardware task force (marked as Low-importance).
 

edit[edit]

  1. the template above was one of the best draft version, with miscellaneous tweakage omitted, respectively.

So I change the template into a column version.

I really suggest we should we should keep the template this way and merge with Template:Apple hardware before 1998. I mean Apple just doesn't have enough things to make it look pretty and there is a fair amount of generation gap havoc. I am not against, but please stop being a bad role model in encouraging other spammy users as seen in AfD to be more illicitly irresponsible and such. Thus, my personal opinion is just wait for 2 months for things in the market to balance off, while you are at it collect all the fandamonium and techy-stuff and contribute it later. It literally doesn't look pretty much when you try to bunch in it altogether. The is going to cause too many edit & style, merely because a battle of differences. Thanks. --173.183.103.242 (talk) 08:21, 19 February 2010 (UTC)