Template talk:Campaignbox Libyan civil war
|WikiProject Politics||(Rated Template-class)|
|WikiProject Africa / Libya||(Rated Template-class)|
With the current counter offensive in the east of the country I wonder if we should update the campaignbox accordingly. I mean
Ra's Lanuf 1 - Bin Jawad - Ra's Lanuf 2 (- Brega 2)
I think there is no need for a second Ra's Lanuf battle article since in the first the rebels took the city on March 4 and secured it on March 5, however the second battle started with the constant bombing of the city on March 6, just a one-day difference. I already just broke up the synopsis of that battle into two phases, first - rebel victory, second - government counteroffensive and victory. However, I agree that, if government troops attack Brega, a second Brega battle article should be created since it has been 8 days since the last battle.EkoGraf (talk) 23:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
East Libyan Desert Campaign seems over
Pre / Post 19 March division
I don't really understand the pre / post 19 match division, it makes the box more confusing and makes it look bloated, the other chronological way was far easier to use and read. - 22.214.171.124 (talk) 01:46, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
'1st Tripoli' and '2nd Tripoli'
Does anyone think this is a good idea? I.e. linking to both main timeline article and the three (in the future possibly four) separate "calendar articles" in infobox? Me think so.