Template talk:Continuing Anglican

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Christianity / Anglicanism (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism.
 

Continuing Jurisdictions[edit]

Should the Continuing Anglican list be limited to only those jurisidictions that endorse the Affirmation of Saint Louis? It seems that's the general consesus amongst people of the ACA and APCK. -- TTTR 2:17PM, 15 May 2008 (PST)

There are three jurisdictions who hold to the Affirmation of St. Louis. The Anglican Catholic Church (ACC), the Anglican Province of Christ the King (APCK), and the United Episcopal Church of North America (UECNA). There are other churches (such as the Orthodox Anglican Church, and the Anglican Province of America) who hold to the Affirmation of St. Louis, but their churches did not come out of the Congress of St. Louis, but pre-dated it (at least in the case of the Orthodox Anglican Church). I think the list should limit itself to those who openly hold to the Affirmation of St. Louis, but that clarification should be made that the three aforementioned churches (ACC, APCK, and UECNA) should be paramount on the list. -- Shadowmane —Preceding undated comment added 02:30, 10 March 2010 (UTC).

Continuing vs Realignment[edit]

Please do not add names to this document unless they meet the Five Pilllars standard for inclusion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.248.108.41 (talk) 19:32, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


Are we going to discuss this or edit war? Maybe a seperate second box is needed. Anon. IP, what do you feel is the problem here. -- SECisek 21:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC) ........................................................................

I gave the discussion/explantion you demanded on the Continuing Anglican page. Read it. It is totally incorrect to mix Continuing Anglian churches with a movement they have no part in and want no part in. There are only a couple of Continuing Anglican churches that tentatively joined, and they are properly included on the Realignment page. The Continuing Anglican template -- a new addition to this long established page -- needs to be corrected. Otherwise, it is fine. The Realignment page, however, need to have all the non-participating Continuing Anglican churches removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.68.248.132 (talkcontribs) 17:04, 29 October 2007

................................................................................

One more point, SECisek. You've listed two Anglican Realignment "organizations" which are not organizations or associations at all but CHURCH BODIES--AMiA and CANA. There is nothing wrong with having all the information that is in both the Anglican Relignment and Continuing Anglican pages, but there are glaring errors in both that you are fighting to keep incorrect. Please explain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.68.248.132 (talk) 22:16, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Feel free to be bold in your correction, why you didn't explain on the talk page after the first revet is beyond me. Please register or log in for an easier time all around. -- SECisek 22:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Redlinks[edit]

Be careful of adding links to articles that do not exist. These leave redlines in the template, which are discouraged by the Manual of Style.

If you think some articles should be added, go ahead and list them here, and if you add a brief reason why, someone else might decide to start one up. Ad.minster (talk) 23:22, 5 December 2008 (UTC)