This template is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
It has just about every attraction at every park. Should it not be changed to the basics (Pirates of the Carribean, Small World, Haunted Mansion etc) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 23:01, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi everyone. Just thought I would set out some guidelines to keep this template runnin' smooth.
1) The attraction goes in the land that it first appeared in. For instance, Pirates of the Caribbean would go in Minor Lands as it first appeared in New Orleans Square, although it traditionally appears in Adventureland. 3) Fireworks and parades go in the Main Street section, not the Fantasyland section, although they appear above the castle which is part of Fantasyland.
4) It doesn't matter if the attraction doesn't exist anymore.
5) The castles are classed as Fantasyland attractions, although they are mostly seen as Main Street attractions.
6) Never ever put an attraction on the template that doesn't have an article. This template is for linking Wikipedia articles of Disney attractions together.
Thanks a lot. --Speedway 20:03, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Do we need this template? Each attraction has a list of the rides for that theme park, and this list is going to be rediculous with every attraction from every park. It is better suited as a list. and have a See Also on each page. Bytebear 06:48, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
I have started a page called List of Disney attractions. I think rather than an inclusive template, why not just have a "See also" section that the user can go to? Bytebear 01:25, 13 January 2007 (UTC)