Template talk:Dukes of Norfolk

Regnal numbers for peers?! Surtsicna (talk) 22:31, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

I wondered when someone was going to notice. Mark J (talk) 15:42, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

House of Howard

I see that the 1660 recreation this Dukedom for the Howards continues with the numbering used by the previous Howards. Shouldn't these therefore be combined into a single row? In a similar way, the 3rd Duke had his Dukedom suspended for a few years, yet we combine his two periods into one entry. I'm going to be bold and do this now; if it violates some standard for nobles, then by all means change it back. But it makes sense to me. —Toby Bartels (talk) 08:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)