Template talk:Football in Germany

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Germany (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Football (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by the German football task force.
 

Template formatting[edit]

I'm not sure what was up with that last series of edits, but if you have a look you'll see that the version I've restored here has a well organized structure that makes sense to read and is easy to follow. Experiments to a sandbox, please? Thanks. Wiggy! (talk) 04:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

  • I reverted it back. If you would have looked a little closer you would have noticed that women's football in Germany was removed from here and place into its own template. The structure that I have makes sense, is easy to read and well organized. Thanks! --Pinkkeith (talk) 21:33, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, just as the structure we had before. So why do you think yours is better? Why should women's and men's football not be in one template? OdinFK (talk) 07:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
  • I never said it was better. I just mentioned what the change was. I followed {{Women's football in England}} and not to mention all of the other football templates out there that have their own template, but could be merged into one. --Pinkkeith (talk) 14:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)