Template talk:Forestry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Forestry (Rated Template-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of forestry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 Top  This template has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Benchmark & discussion[edit]

This template is nearing 'maturity', I think. Always room for further development. (For one thing, there are many underlying links to categories rather than articles. Indication of prospective future articles in need of development.) In its current form, this navigation box emphasizes different types of/ approaches to forestry. As a high-level guide to Wikipedia forestry articles, this is a key template for WikiProject Forestry. If anyone has thoughts/ suggestions for further improvement and development of this template, please discuss here. Input from more scientifically oriented forestry perspectives would be especially welcome. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 14:40, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Size and image[edit]

It's getting pretty big, maybe too big. Maybe the image robs it of horizontal space too. Thoughts? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Anna, Yes, I have (both of) those concerns, too. One thought is to put a few more things on the bottom bar. It may be possible to do some editing/ streamlining, too. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 13:07, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
I don't know about the bottom bar plan. Your layout is pretty darn good. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:58, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Above and below[edit]

I'm thinking Outline, Index, and Forest areas might better be in an above line. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:50, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. Thanks for the suggestion. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 14:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC)