This template is within the scope of WikiProject Monty Python, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Monty Python on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
I'm not sure if that warrants his inclusions, so will just leave these notes here for consideration. -- Quiddity (talk) 17:58, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
IIRC, he was one of their writers. - Denimadept (talk) 19:59, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm more concerned about the inclusion of Neil Innes, who wasn't ever considered a "full member" until quite recently. If he merits inclusion in the template, certainly Connie Booth and Charles McKeown also merit inclusion. And Douglas Adams would warrant the same consideration. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 21:08, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
How do we establish how related an article is to Monty Python? Bert Fegg's book is rather obscure, even though it was written by Michael Palin and Terry Jones. Should related articles be limited only to sketch shows the group has done? 18.104.22.168 (talk) 22:20, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Actually, as the article on the Berg Fegg book clearly indicates that it was a Monty Python release (I have a copy of the book and can verify it's labelled "A Monty Python Educational Product") it belongs in the book section, so I will move it there now. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 16:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)