Template talk:Ongoing military conflicts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Military history
MILHIST This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Temp Templates and modules do not require a rating on the quality assessment scale.

Bahraini uprising[edit]

Bahraini uprising is not a military conflict. so it should be removed from here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 3bdulelah (talkcontribs) 17:46, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

"Middle East vs. "East and South Asia"[edit]

Most of our categories seem to reflect "Middle East". Would any one mind if I changed it back to that? Juno (talk) 23:22, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

You are correct that Middle East and West Asia is almost interchangeable, even though there are some issues whether including Egypt and Caucasus. However in practice, we find out many people have no idea where is Middle East and how it is defined. In the past people tended to add central Asia and North Africa conflicts as "Middle Eastern" all the time, which created a lot of work to correct it. Now it is much more stable.GreyShark (dibra) 12:44, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Tricky point that, with the Caucuses. Would it be worthwhile to just defer to what ever the wiki-consensus definition of the regions are at the moment or are those foggy too? Juno (talk) 07:38, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
The most common geographical consensus is using West Asia and not Middle East (which is also very much Eurocentric by the way, which many people don't like).GreyShark (dibra) 16:34, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
I mean this in the most collegiate of ways; could you point to such a consensus? I can by no means claim a broad survey, but I mostly seem to see "Middle East". Juno (talk) 20:37, 2 November 2014 (UTC)