Template talk:Pedophilia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Psychology (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Sociology (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Sexuality (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Crime (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Crime, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

Removed entries[edit]

Although I believe the template cannot be kept stable and away from WP:BLP violations, I've removed a number of entries which are not associated with pedophilia in any credible way. Some of the scandals had evidence of child sexual abuse or accusations of pedophilia, but none of the accusations were credible. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:31, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Hebephilia and ephebophilia should also be removed or categorized under a different name, as made clear in the deletion debate. Flyer22 (talk) 16:20, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Articles listing the template[edit]

It would be best to ensure that the articles removed from the template also have the template removed from those articles; I took care of my removals, but.... 05:34, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Done my part. Oct13 (talk) 05:44, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Nepiophilia link[edit]

The template's link to Nepiophilia has as it's target Pedophilia#Etymology and definitions. Since we don't have more than a definition on this term, I'm wondering if having this linked item is the right thing. __meco (talk) 08:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

I was gonna make an article on nepiophilia but it redirects to pedophilia. Oct13 (talk) 14:28, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Just made an article for Nepiophilia (Infantophilia). Oct13 (talk) 16:28, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Just wondering, what's the name for attraction towards children under three? __meco (talk) 19:21, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
There is no need for a Nepiophilia article. It is a form of pedophilia, and there is not much to state about it on its own. That's why it redirected to the Pedophilia article and should be redirected back there. Further, nepiophilia is a sexual preference for infants and toddlers (meaning ages 0–3). If we're going to say it also refers to "children over the age of three," then where does the age bracket stop? We might as well say nepiophilia covers all of pedophilia. This is why we don't use sources like rightdiagnosis.com to define psychological topics such as this. We use high-quality, scholarly sources, per WP:MEDRS. Flyer22 (talk) 16:20, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Groups[edit]

I don't exactly disagree with this, but if a list is to be included (at all) it should be reasonably complete in its coverage of the most notable associations that we have articles on, instead of a haphazard selection. Like I said in an edit summary, a single link to an overview article or perhaps a category link may be better. Tijfo098 (talk) 12:40, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Also, calling them "pedophile associations" was a bit of whitewashing, but I suppose whoever added the line in the first place found a more descriptive name too long. Tijfo098 (talk) 12:51, 24 September 2012 (UTC)