Template talk:Scientology
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scientology template. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|||
| Archives: 1 | |||
|
|
|||
| WikiProject Scientology | (Rated Template-class, High-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| All articles related to Scientology are subject to sanctions imposed by the Arbitration Committee | ||
|---|---|---|
|
See the Scientology arbitration case
Any current or future editor who makes substantial edits to any Scientology-related articles or discussions on any page is directed:
(Authorized by the Arbitration Committee by motion on 1 June 2012) |
||
Missing (?) entries in the template [edit]
I'm forgoing my usual edit first and defend later approach and allowing those more in the know to revise this template as they see fit. Below are Wikipedia Scientology articles not in Template:Scientology as of 06:35, 26 December 2010 (UTC). Some probably should be in the template (e.g., Scientology in Russia) and perhaps others should be sent to AfD. I'll leave it up to you:
-- Uzma Gamal (talk) 06:35, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- I feel that this template is no longer sufficient. We should split into smaller subtemplates if we are to add all this information. I am talking about a Template:Scientology bibliography to encompass publications by the Church of Scientology, and independent texts about Scientology. More smaller templates may be needed to prevent making this a clusterfuck. > RUL3R>trolling>vandalism 07:49, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- This template should continue to be used on "core" and "main" type articles, but it would be a great idea to create some sub-topic templates, such as the one suggested, above. -- Cirt (talk) 17:16, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- I have been bold and created the new template on my userspace, awaiting discussion for that. We should also discuss other possible templates. > RUL3R>trolling>vandalism 03:38, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
- This template should continue to be used on "core" and "main" type articles, but it would be a great idea to create some sub-topic templates, such as the one suggested, above. -- Cirt (talk) 17:16, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
I have added the Nation Of Islam due to their current existence as a Dianetics organisation. [edit]
If there was a Dianetics template, then it would obviously fit more there. But I think it also fits here... This is the latest news about this from their own website: http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/National_News_2/article_9651.shtml
http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/National_News_2/article_8648.shtml
http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/Minister_Louis_Farrakhan_9/article_7648.shtml
They have over 1055 "Nation of Islam" Auditors now and have apparently done 82 thousand hours of auditing. Scary, but this is the fact, they do deserve to be placed here now. They are officially connected(and have been publically since 2010, privately since 2006). It's totally freaky that one of the most racist Negro organisations in existence has suddenly embraced Dianetics and formed an alliance with the Church, but it IS the fact. Colliric (talk) 02:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC)