Template talk:Shrek

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Film (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by the American cinema task force.
 
WikiProject Children's literature (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Animation / American / Films / Computer / DreamWorks Animation (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

Update[edit]

This template needs to be updated - templates don't look like this anymore. I will update this. — « hippi ippi » 03:16, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Looks better, eh? — « hippi ippi » 03:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Video Games[edit]

Um... I think it should go. Or at least, a new article should be made listing all the video games and a link for this article to be placed in "other" to save space. Should this be done for Music as well,. using the Category:Shrek music link? — « hippi ippi » 08:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Shrek 5[edit]

Please don't add links to Shrek 5 until an article exists (which won't happen until there is significant verifiable information available on that film). There's no purpose in listing or linking to an article which doesn't exist. Zetawoof(ζ) 21:54, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Video Game Templete?![edit]

The video game templete is all over the place! I'm gonna sort them in order of when they come out, so you don't have the confusion of Shrek, Shrek 2, god knows how many more games and then finally Shrek the third. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 17:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

RE, I have made changes to this templete, and can I please say that they are all valid, as I've named these games IN ORDER, of gamespot so please don't delete them. Thankyou, mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 17:49, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
2RE, My edit on the Shrek Video games templete was a bit of a mess, so this link [1] should be used by a skilled wikipedian, to clean up, and re-organize (in order of date of releace never the less I might add.) the templete in the video game section of the Shrek Templete. Thankyou, mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 14:03, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Color scheme[edit]

In this revision I added a color scheme to this template. It has since been reverted. It is very common for navbox templates to feature a custom color scheme. The Simpsons, Disney, Six Flags and Universal Studios Florida among many others all have custom color schemes. When the navbox is included in a large stack such as that on Shrek 4-D, I think that the color scheme plays an important role in easy identification. Does anyone else think that a custom color scheme for this template would be good? Themeparkgc Chat bubble 1.svg 04:34, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

The Problem with the Boots[edit]

Shouldn't Puss in Boots be separate from the actual Shrek films? Perhaps there should be a main series portion and a spin-off portion. I would do this myself, but I really don't know how to edit templates. Could somebody address this issue? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DietBrain (talkcontribs) 23:17, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

I agree. This kind of organization had been already in use, before somebody disagreed and merged all films: [2]. --Carniolus (talk) 15:48, 24 March 2013 (UTC)