Template talk:Slitheen stories

Doctor Who Template‑class

	Doctor Who portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Television Template‑class

	Television portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. For how to use this banner template, see its documentation.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Template	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Minor Appearence in Dalek[edit]

Slitheen had a minor appearance in Dalek Lollypop2 18:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

does this count??--Wiggstar69 23:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think a stuffed arm really counts as an appearance. Stuart DD _{contributions} 21:41, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then neither does the apperance in graske. Lollypop2 16:06, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How exactly do you come to that conclusion? Stuart DD _{contributions} 11:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

to be really pedantic[edit]

How do we know that the Raxacoricofallapatorian seen in the End of Time is a member of the Slitheen family? 188.221.79.22 (talk) 16:48, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the Blatheen from The Gift certainly aren't. Problem is, though, they're referred to much more as Slitheen than Raxa-whatever-ians, so to name the box "Raxacoricavfvgkrujaadfidijdjkian stories" might mislead people who aren't familiar with that aspect of them. Haipa Doragon (talk) 03:38, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]