Template talk:Spyro

Video games Template‑class

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Template

This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Altaïr Ibn-LaʼAhad (1 participant)
Police Trainer (0 participants)
Turboraketti (4 participants)
Beam Invader (0 participants)
Sephiroth (12 participants)
1993 Space Machine (2 participants)
The Boss (Metal Gear) (0 participants)
Silfade (2 participants)
List of World of Watches characters (2 participants)
Nodus Domini (2 participants)
List of Fate/Grand Order characters (8 participants)
Balloon Brothers (2 participants; relisted)
Enigma Engine (2 participants; relisted)
ClanLib (5 participants; relisted)
Dan Gelber (game designer) (5 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Main Villains vs Subbosses[edit]

Such as Gnasty Gnorc and Toasty, etc., and Ripto and Crush and Gulp. Should the sub-villains be their own articles or sections of their main villain's? We've got it going both ways here, as Toasty is separate from Gnasty, but Crush and Gulp are a section of Ripto. And there's no mention of Buzz, Spike, and Scorch at all.

Ineptune also has her own page... potentially. Should it redirect to a subsection of Red? And should there also be a subsection of Red for Gnasty, but with a link to the main article there?

I also have to say that whoever redid the layout did well.

Tom Temprotran 03:45, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'm doing work on splitting the Spyro series article up into one article per game, so the sub-bosses should really be mentioned in the game's article. Level bosses aren't notable/verifiable enough to warrant their own articles, and merging them into articles about the main villains isn't as good. --Stratadrake 20:45, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. Though if they're more importantly actual minions of the character, like Crush and Gulp are, then they should belong with their boss. Tom Temprotran 05:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Elora?![edit]

Hey, who removed Elora? Just because she's not in any of the Vivendi-made games doesn't mean she doesn't belong in the series template. Tom Temprotran 04:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spin offs[edit]

What criteria does Wikipedia use to describe the GBA games and Shadow Legacy as Spin offs? It's probably harmless but it seems rather odd to assign an entry as a spin off simply because it's on a Nintendo handheld. 100.34.38.127 (talk) 01:08, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]