Template talk:Supertall proposed skyscrapers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Skyscrapers (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

proposed buildings can't have been 300 meters tall

Should Somebody add taltin's tower to this template?

Ryugyong Hotel[edit]

Why is this building in the 'cancelled' section? It has never been officially cancelled, it even has been built and reached almost its proposed height. Officially, construction is just on hold. I wonder whether it should appear in this box at all. -- H005 07:33, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

See Also[edit]

Linking to a template in the see also section seems kind of weird. Is there a better way to get the information across? --OGoncho (talk) 19:46, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Millennium Tower, Tokyo[edit]

I would like to know if there is any other criterion to consider a building a "vision" rather than being labeled as such in its official website (http://www.fosterandpartners.com/Projects/0504/Default.aspx). Meanwhile, I took the liberty to add it.Theodopulus (talk) 23:42, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Dynamic Tower[edit]

Who removed it? I think it will be a supertall! --Sneaky Oviraptor18talk edits tribute 19:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

I've readded it. Remember that "supertall" is classified in this case by being over 300 metres. --timsdad (talk) 06:18, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
I know! Don't remind me! Anyway it might not be a supertall because it has only 70 / 77 floors! --Sneaky Oviraptor18talk edits tribute 19:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Well if you did know that then you would know that the amount of floors makes no difference. This discussion is going nowhere, please don't reply. --timsdad (talk) 07:38, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
-_- ITS A VISION not PROPOSED.. --98.185.24.220 (talk) 14:04, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

De Nederlandse Berg[edit]

What about “De Nederlandse Berg”? --84.61.156.142 (talk) 13:34, 2 September 2011 (UTC)