This template is within the scope of WikiProject Universities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of universities and colleges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This template is pretty weak. It shows a small number of schools, rather than all the faculties. As such, it conceals, for example, all the Humanities.--Duncan (talk) 09:58, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
I believe that the limiting factor is that there aren't actually articles on the faculties. If there are, then they should be definitely linked in, probably right at the top of the template. Mike Peel (talk) 12:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
You are right: there are not. But surely we should have stubs, at the least. If schoolpages are useful, then faculty pages should be more useful. --Duncan (talk) 17:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
All the faculties are there. I am not sure all Schools will have an article in the near future. Its mainly Schools with a significant history rather than the ones that are recent agglomerations that lend themselves to encyclopedic articles. I am not convinced that they are notable. In a similar vein some of the faculty articles are never likely to be more than stubs. EPS and Humanities are fairly arbitrary divisions and there is never likely to be much to say about them, by contrast Medicine and Life Sciences are identifiable subject areas with long and distinguished histories in Manchester. The bottom line is that the importance of a unit in the organizational structure of the university is not an indication of its importance from an encyclopedic point of view.Billlion (talk) 06:06, 16 June 2009 (UTC)