Template talk:Usul al-fiqh
The Ahkam section needs to be changed - those five levels are disputed amongst the sunni madhahib, I think a note should be made about this. For example, the Hanafis differentiate between Wajib and Fard.
- Feel free to fix it. --Striver 09:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Position of Ijma
- No comment. Be bold. --Striver 00:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Very bad template
I just noticed this template -- it is extremely badly done. It is too long and detailed and since most of the terms are transliterated Arabic terms that would be unfamiliar to non-Muslims (and to many uneducated Muslims) it is close to useless. What the heck does the average English speaking reader make of Usul al-fiqh? An exotic Syrian delicacy involving figs?
I removed it from the mullah article, where it was longer than the article and completely unbalanced the formatting. If you want to use this template, it needs to be drastically revised. Zora 09:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Scholarly titles section
The ordering of the scholarly titles at the bototm of this box seems arbitrary. Not sure which is the best ordering. Probably I would recommend English alphabetical. ZaydHammoudeh 02:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- This is the English Wiki so yes, order by the English alphabet RooZ 01:26, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- I removed a line that was added on incorrectly "*love (husband and wife)" that did not seem to be a title, it only linked to english word love. --Dishcmds (talk) 04:22, 24 February 2011 (UTC)