Template talk:Virgin Group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject United Kingdom (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 
WikiProject Business (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

AirAsia X in Virgin Group[edit]

Just wondering, since Virgin Group has 20% stakes in AirAsia X, should the link of AirAsia X be included in the template? --Zack2007 06:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure all the companies on this page have Virgin Group holding the controlling stock, so no, I don't think AirAsia X should be included. NcSchu(Talk) 13:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Actually, I was wrong, so I've gone ahead and added it. NcSchu(Talk) 13:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
I was about to say that Virgin Group's share in Virgin Blue is only 25%. I am not for or against AirAsia X's presence in the template, just curious on whats the criteria to be put in the box. I guess 20% shares are substantial shares, even though its not called "Virgin", as some of the companies under Virgin Group do not have the word Virgin either. --Zack2007 —Preceding comment was added at 13:52, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, that's why I agreed that it should be added. It's on the Virgin Group page and even though it doesn't have the Virgin name and 20 or 25% isn't a majority holding we've kept companies on the list that have been completely sold off from Virgin so there was really no reason to not include it. NcSchu(Talk) 14:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)