Template talk:WikiProject Anime and manga

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Anime and manga (Rated Template-class)
Wikipe-tan head.png This template is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This is a template and is not rated on the assessment scale.
See Template:WikiProject Anime and manga/doc for documentation

Default portal image[edit]

Currently, there are two different portal images, depending on how the portal template is called. Which one would people prefer? I'm not watching this page, so it would be great if you could comment at Template talk:Portal#Case duplicates. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:35, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

{{Portal|Anime and manga}}
{{Portal|Anime and Manga}}

Bug[edit]

The columns don't line up on my browser. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:31, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Anime and manga (Rated Template-class)
Wikipe-tan head.png This template is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Template  This is a template and is not rated on the assessment scale.
Crystal Clear troll dots.png
Thistemplate is supported by the Digimon work group.
Seems to be something that was introduced by one of the metabanner sub-templates. This is probably a good example of why we shouldn't be using them in the first place. —Farix (t | c) 15:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

new TF[edit]

Please add |visual-novels-task-force= so that "yes" outputs " This article is supported by the Visual novels task force".Jinnai 00:06, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

I think it probably should be piped to WP:VN's page instead, just as how {{film}}'s WP:WARFILMS link points to the page at WP:MILHIST (through a redirect). -- クラウド668 00:59, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Not done: {{edit protected}} is not required for edits to unprotected pages, or pending changes protected pages. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:00, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Missing white space.[edit]

I have added the missing white space to this template but am not sure I found it all. Would someone please check my work to see if I missed anything? – Allen4names 22:49, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Monthly merge categories[edit]

When merge=yes, this template does not put the article into the monthly merge categories. As a result, these pages are being missed by WikiProject Merge. Please fix. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 12:49, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

The idea was for the Anime and Manga project to track outstanding or possible mergers, not for it to be a replacement for the normal 'Merge' templates... if required, I guess this can be done, but it might be a fairly complex change? G.A.Stalk 13:24, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
I might be able to help. Can you show me a template doing what you want? Goodraise 13:43, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Not done: The articles themselves should have merge templates on them which will categorize the articles. The talk page doesn't need to be categorized, that happens along with the article merge. — Bility (talk) 19:05, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Most of them don't have the merge tags on them. Whether the merge is done, whether the tag was deleted, or whether it was never there in the first place is impossible to know, but it's a problem that needs to be fixed. Thus, lets put them in monthly categories so that they get listed even when they don't have the tags. Alternately, remove the merge option from this template, as it seems to be causing more problems than not. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 00:27, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

I reactivated this template because the problems real and has not been addressed. The claim that the articles have the regular merge templates is flat-out false, so resolution to this is needed. What we have are pages in the merge backlog with no date, no discussion, and no indication of where to merge to.

Not done: You are autoconfirmed. The edit semi-protected is for non-autoconfirmed editors. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 04:34, 7 April 2012 (UTC)