Template talk:WikiProject Argentina

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Argentina (Rated Template-class)
WikiProject icon This template is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve WikiProject Argentina, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.
 Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

Usage example[edit]

{{WPArgentina|topic=geo|class=B|importance=mid}} produces:

WikiProject Argentina.gif This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentine Geography.

If you would like to participate, you can improve WikiProject Argentina, or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.

Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.

And the following categories: Category:WPArgentina geography articles Category:Mid-importance Argentine articles Category:B-Class Argentine articles Category:WPArgentina mid-importance fair articles Category:WPArgentina Mid-Low-importance geography articles

Discussion[edit]

If you wish ot know more about this template, its use and its parameters, please go to the Parameters page, ad leave a message at its talk page if you wish to discuss it. Regarding the Importance categorization, carefully read the Importance guidelines, and comment them at the guidelines' talk page.

Mariano(t/c) 11:34, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Little Thing[edit]

Now that more and more articles are tagged, I realize that all the cats link to the "talk" pages, since all the templates are placed on the talk pages... The categories all point to talks, but shouldn't they maybe point to the original article? That way, when we go to Category:WPArgentina sports articles, we don't see Talk:Diego Maradona, we see Diego Maradona. Just an idea.

Sebastian Kessel Talk 15:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, this is the standard for non-encyclopedic scope. It to avoid confusing the non-contributing user with even more categories at the article's page. See for instance Talk:Argentina. Mariano(t/c) 06:35, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I know, is just that the cat pages don't look quite as good. :) Sebastian Kessel Talk 16:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Image[edit]

Mariano, while your images are nearly always good, the sun on Image:WikiProject Argentina.svg is clearly out of focus. Of course, I'm not forcing you to fix this, but please note that my edit was done in good faith. =) And by the way, SVGs are only used when its quality is superior than other images; as stated on the Wikimedia Commons, "[the SVG image] should be used in place of this raster image when superior." --Proudly Argie 02:36, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi there. I didn't assume bad faith, just didn't know why it was reverted, since there was no comment at the summary. On the other hand, I'm not sure what do you mean about the SVG image being out of focus. I'm looking at the SVG image, and it looks far better and shaper than the GIF version. You don't happen by chance to use Internet Explorer, do you? It doesn't have SVG support, so a plug-in must convert it the image. Perhaps that conversion is the poor one, and you see a poor image. The SVG image look really cool in my Opera. Please, chech the SVG image, and zoom it out, you'll see it is of high quality. Also, check Scalable Vector Graphics. Mariano(t/c) 09:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Image:WikiProject Argentina.gif
Image:WikiProject Argentina.svg
I'm neither questioning the quality nor forcing you to modify the image; but check the logos on the right of my message, and compare the suns on both. Certainly, you'll note that the sun of Image:WikiProject Argentina.svg is partially moved to the left, whereas in Image:WikiProject Argentina.gif is exactly in the center. As I said before this has nothing to do with quality (and neither with the good ol' one, of course =P), but rather with the logo itself. Thanks for your understanding, --Proudly Argie 12:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Mm, I still don't see anything out of focus. for the centering, it could be, I'll chech it at the SVG editor... Mariano(t/c) 14:38, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Should be fixed now. Another reason to use the SVG format is that it is not withing a white square. Mariano(t/c) 10:19, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
If there's no other inconvenient, I'll switch to the SVG format again. Mariano(t/c) 06:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
The logo looks perfect now, thanks a lot for fixing it. =) You can switch it if you want. Goodbye, --Proudly Argie 22:31, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks and good wiking. Mariano(t/c) 07:46, 19 October 2006 (UTC)