Template talk:WikiProject Classical music

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Replace code[edit]

{{edit protected}} Please replace with the code at Template:Classical/sandbox. Thanks! §hep¡Talk to me! 16:11, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. Graham87 07:13, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

MetaBanner[edit]

Would there be any objections or concerns to converting this banner to use Template:WPBannerMeta? Martin 21:25, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Please ask the Classical Music Project. Unfortunately no-one will see your question if you leave it here. --Kleinzach 07:41, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Why the change to this banner? Was the project told about it?[edit]

I see this banner has been moved by User:Happy-melon, see [1]. Perhaps we can have an explanation? Was the project told about it? I can't see any post at the Classical Music Project. --Kleinzach 07:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Also, isn't this template protected? --Kleinzach 08:14, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Once again this has been changed without notice by User:Happy-melon and it now seems to be set to B class! --Kleinzach 23:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Revert, please[edit]

{{edit protected}} Can we revert to the Antandrus version of 18 October 2008? This was changed without informing or consulting the project and seems to have been screwed up. It now displays B class — at least on the template page. Thank you. --Kleinzach 04:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Can you explain exactly what is broken? From what I can see, everything is working okay. --- RockMFR 06:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Look at the Template:WikiProject Classical music. As explained above it now says B class. --Kleinzach 06:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done This is a default style I've seen on many other templates converted to this meta template. The template isn't broken. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 06:59, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Why doesn't this template assess?[edit]

I can't think of any reason why it shouldn't. So why has the assessment been turned off? Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 12:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Very simple. This project doesn't do assessments. --Kleinzach 00:51, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Lord Strad[edit]

I was hoping that you could help me out with something. I reviewed a new article Lord Strad, which appears to be the name that authors of the book Lord Strad of 1716 gave to a "missing" Stradivarius that has the initial history of the Messiah Stradivarius. Would you mind taking a look at the information I posted at Talk:Lord Strad - and the options, whether to delete the article altogether or rework the article as Lord Strad of 1716 with information from a The Strad magazine review of the book. Or, another option based upon your subject matter knowledge?--CaroleHenson (talk) 02:54, 27 November 2013 (UTC)