Temporal motivation theory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Temporal motivation theory (TMT) is an integrative motivational theory. Developed by Piers Steel and Cornelius J. Konig, the theory emphasizes time as a critical, motivational factor. The argument for a broad, integrative theory stems from the absence of a single theory that can address motivation in its entirety. Thus, it incorporates primary aspects of multiple major theories, including expectancy theory, hyperbolic discounting, need theory and cumulative prospect theory.[1] According to Schmidt, Dolis and Tolli, Temporal Motivation Theory "may help further the understanding of the impact of time, and particularly deadlines, on dynamic attention allocation."[2] The Temporal Motivation Theory formula can be applied to the human behaviour, procrastination[3][4] and to goal setting. According to Lord, Diefenforff, Schmidt and Hall, the theory "models the motivating power of approaching deadlines, arguing that the perceived utility of a given activity increases exponentially as the deadline nears. These and similar ideas have been applied to the pervasive phenomenon of procrastination".[5]

Model[edit]

The theory states an individual's motivation for a task can be derived with the following formula (in its simplest form):

\mathrm{Motivation} = \frac{\mbox{Expectancy × Value}}{\mbox{1 + Impulsiveness × Delay}}



where Motivation, the desire for a particular outcome, Expectancy or self-efficacy is the probability of success, Value is the reward associated with the outcome, Impulsiveness is the individual’s sensitivity to delay and Delay is the time to realization.[6]

To see how temporal motivation theory can be applied in an example, consider a student given one month to study for a final exam. The student is given two options—studying and socializing. The student enjoys socializing but needs to achieve a good grade. The reward of studying is not immediate thus at the beginning of the student's study period, the motivation to study is lower than the motivation to socialize. However, as the study period diminishes from several weeks to several days, the motivation to study will surpass the motivation to socialize.[6]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Steel, P.; Konig, C. J. (2006). "Integrating Theories of Motivation". Academy of Management Review 31 (4): 889–913. doi:10.5465/amr.2006.22527462. 
  2. ^ Schmidt, A.; Dolis, C. M., Tolli, A. P. (2009). "A Matter of Time: Individual Differences, Contextual Dynamics and Goal Progress Effects on Multiple-Goal Self-Regulation". Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (3): 692–709. doi:10.1037/a0015012. 
  3. ^ Steel, P. (2010). The Procrastination Equation: How to stop putting things off and start getting stuff done. Toronto, Canada: Vintage Canada. ISBN 978-0-307-35717-5. 
  4. ^ Petz, Sarah (May 12, 2011). "Procrastination down to a science". Macleans on Campus. Retrieved September 21, 2012
  5. ^ Lord, R. G.; Diefendorff, J. M., Schmidt, A.M., Hall, R. J. (2010). "Self-Regulation at Work". Annual Review of Psychology 61: 543–548. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100314. 
  6. ^ a b Steel, Piers (2007). "The Nature of Procrastination: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review of Quintessential Self-Regulatory Failure". Psychological Bulletin 133 (1): 65–94. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65. PMID 17201571.