Tend and befriend
Tend and befriend is a behavior exhibited by some animals, including humans, when under threat. It refers to protection of offspring (tending) and seeking out the social group for mutual defense (befriending) that was theorized as having evolved as the typical female response to stress, just as the primary male response was Fight-or-flight. The tend-and-befriend idea was originally developed by Dr. Shelley E. Taylor and her research team at the University of California, Los Angeles and first described in a Psychological Review article published in the year 2000.
Versus fight or flight
The dominant model of the human responses to stress has been the fight or flight response. In response to threat, humans (and other animals) can become aggressive and confront a stressor (fight) or flee either literally or through avoidant coping, such as social withdrawal or substance abuse. From the standpoint of human beings, however, this analysis of stress responses is incomplete. Another tendency is to affiliate, that is, to come together in groups in threatening times. This tend and befriend response refers to the fact that people often manage threats by caring for offspring and seeking social support in time of stress.
Dr. Stephen Porges believes that there is an affiliative neurocircuitry that prompts affiliation especially in response to stress; he calls it Social Nervous System and it is part of Polyvagal Theory. Research suggests that this system regulates social approach behavior, much as hunger, thirst, or sexual drives are biologically regulated. A biological basis for this regulation appears to be oxytocin.
Oxytocin has been tied to a broad array of social relationships and activities, including peer bonding, sexual activity, and affiliative preferences. Oxytocin is released in humans in response to at least some stressors, especially those that may trigger affiliative needs. Oxytocin prompts affiliative behavior, including maternal tending and social contact with peers. Thus affiliation under stress serves tending needs, including protective response towards offspring, and may also take the form of befriending, namely seeking social contact for one's own protection, the protection of offspring, and the protection of the social group. These social responses to threat reduce biological stress responses, including elevated heart rate, blood pressures, and hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis stress responses, such as cortisol.
Benefits of affiliation under stress
It has been claimed that, from the standpoint of evolutionary theory, there would be survival benefits of an affiliative response to threat and that tending activities also reduce biological stress responses in both parents and offspring, thereby reducing stress-related threats to their health.
It is argued that "befriending" leads to substantial mental and physical health benefits in times of stress. Social isolation is tied to a significantly enhanced risk of mortality, whereas social support is tied to a broad array of beneficial health outcomes, including reduced risk of illness and death.
Tend and befriend has been heavily studied in females. One reason for this fact is that estrogen enhances the effects of oxytocin which, as noted, is believed to be an important biological underpinning of tend and befriend.
Research shows that women are more likely to seek the company of others in times of stress, compared to men.
Although both men and women show the biological fight or flight pattern of arousal (e.g., elevated heart rate and blood pressure), men's behavior under stress is better characterized by fight (aggression) and by flight (social withdrawal, substance abuse) in response to stress.
Women have higher life expectancies from birth in most countries where there is equal access to medical care. In the United States, for example, this difference is almost 6 years. It has been hypothesized that one reason may be that men's responses to stress (which include aggression, social withdrawal, and substance abuse) place them at risk for adverse health-related consequences, whereas women's more social responses to stress are healthier behaviors. Whether these gender differences in responsivity to stress help to explain the gender gap in mortality is not yet known (other possible factors abound, such as estrogen stimulating the immune system while testosterone suppresses it, or the evolutionary pressure to withstand the stresses of near-constant pregnancy in pre-modern cultures leaving modern women with generally untapped reserves).
- Taylor, Shelley E.; Klein, Laura Cousino; Lewis, Brian P.; Gruenewald, Tara L.; Gurung, Regan A. R.; Updegraff, John A. (2000). "Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight". Psychological Review 107 (3): 411–29. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.411. PMID 10941275.
- Cohen, Sheldon; Wills, Thomas A. (1985). "Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis". Psychological Bulletin 98 (2): 310–57. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310. PMID 3901065.
- "Renew - Stress on the Brain (popular expositions with references)". Franklin Institute. 2004. Retrieved May 9, 2012.
- Carter, C.S., Lederhendler, I.I., & Kirkpatrick, B., eds. (1999). The integrative neurobiology of affiliation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.[page needed]
- Insel, Thomas R. (1997). "A Neurobiological Basis of Social Attachment". American Journal of Psychiatry 154 (6): 726–35. PMID 9167498.
- Light, Kathleen C.; Smith, Tara E.; Johns, Josephine M.; Brownley, Kimberly A.; Hofheimer, Julie A.; Amico, Janet A. (2000). "Oxytocin responsivity in mothers of infants: A preliminary study of relationships with blood pressure during laboratory stress and normal ambulatory activity". Health Psychology 19 (6): 560–7. doi:10.1037/0278-6126.96.36.1990. PMID 11129359.
- Taylor, S.E. (2002). The tending instinct: How nurturing is essential to who we are and how we live. New York: Holt.[page needed]
- McCarthy, MM (1995). "Estrogen modulation of oxytocin and its relation to behavior". Advances in experimental medicine and biology 395: 235–45. PMID 8713972.
- Tamres, Lisa K.; Janicki, Denise; Helgeson, Vicki S. (2002). "Sex Differences in Coping Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review and an Examination of Relative Coping". Personality and Social Psychology Review 6: 2. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_1.
- Williams, David R. (2003). "The Health of Men: Structured Inequalities and Opportunities". American Journal of Public Health 93 (5): 724–31. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.5.724. PMC 1447828. PMID 12721133.
- Verbrugge, Lois M. (1985). "Gender and Health: An Update on Hypotheses and Evidence". Journal of Health and Social Behavior 26 (3): 156–82. JSTOR 2136750. PMID 3905939.
- Aronson, E., Wilson, T.D., & Akert, R.M. (2005). Social Psychology. (5th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
- Friedman, H.S., & Silver, R.C. (Eds.) (2007). Foundations of Health Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Gurung, R.A.R. (2006). Health Psychology: A Cultural Approach. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.